Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0496

reference
155-tree-1
name
0496
tree-preservation-order

undefined

155-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.008061 50.851076)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.007990 50.851068,-1.007993 50.851082,-1.008003 50.851095,-1.008019 50.851105,-1.008038 50.851111,-1.008060 50.851114,-1.008082 50.851112,-1.008102 50.851105,-1.008118 50.851096,-1.008128 50.851083,-1.008132 50.851069,-1.008129 50.851055,-1.008119 50.851043,-1.008104 50.851033,-1.008084 50.851026,-1.008062 50.851024,-1.008040 50.851026,-1.008020 50.851032,-1.008004 50.851042,-1.007994 50.851054,-1.007990 50.851068)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL